netdev - Re: stmmac patches...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091120.094019.163421376.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:40:19 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	peppe.cavallaro@...com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stmmac patches...

From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:19:14 +0100

>> Please fix this up and resubmit both of your patches.
> 
> I've just resent the second patch:
>  [PATCH (RESENT)] stmmac: do not fail when the timer cannot be used.
> Let me know if I have to review something in my first patch as well.

I explicitly asked you to resubmit both patches, so that I would have
them in a group together to apply to my tree.

When changes are requested in some patches within a group, I mark
the entire group in patchwork with state 'changed requested' and
that's why I ask for the whole series to be resubmitted.

This means you should have resent the first patch even though I did
not ask you to make any changes to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html