[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B081A81.5000602@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:51:13 -0500
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v7 3/7 RFC] TCPCT part 1c: sysctl_tcp_cookie_size,
socket option TCP_COOKIE_TRANSACTIONS
David Miller wrote:
> From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:33:51 -0500
>
>> @@ -59,6 +59,14 @@ int sysctl_tcp_base_mss __read_mostly = 512;
>> /* By default, RFC2861 behavior. */
>> int sysctl_tcp_slow_start_after_idle __read_mostly = 1;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>> +/* By default, let the user enable it. */
>> +int sysctl_tcp_cookie_size __read_mostly = 0;
>> +#else
>> +int sysctl_tcp_cookie_size __read_mostly = TCP_COOKIE_MAX;
>> +#endif
>> +
>
> I would prefer if the default did not depend upon whether
> SYSCTL is enabled or not. That's extremely non-intuitive.
>
>
This code was based on net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c for syncookies.
Apparently, default for syncookies has been controversial.
Would you accept always default to TCP_COOKIE_MAX?
The code already automatically reduces the size of the cookie to
match available space in the TCP options (part 1f).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists