netdev - Re: large packet loss take2 2.6.31.x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <81bfc67a0911221135y300841f2i8e78417600528cd5@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:35:10 -0500
From:	Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@...il.com>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: large packet loss take2 2.6.31.x

haven't had time to do a test yet. but would it be of any use for you
all for me to throw another nic (it'd be a different driver for sure)
in this box and test that on a problematic kernel? I have some but not
with me.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:10:34PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:21:19PM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote:
>> > yeah testing it under my known working config first. I'll get back w/ you later.
>>
>> Btw, since dropping at hardware (NIC) level seems more likely to me,
>> could you send 'ethtool eth0', and 'ethtool -S eth0' after such tests
>> (both sides).
>
> Hmm... and 'netstat -s' before and after the test (both sides).
>
> Jarek P.
>



-- 
Caleb Cushing

http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html