lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4B08C3C6.8010601@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:53:26 -0500 From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v7 4/7 RFC] TCPCT part 1d: define TCP cookie option, extend existing struct's David Miller wrote: > From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com> > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:38:12 -0500 > >> static inline void tcp_clear_options(struct tcp_options_received *rx_opt) >> { >> - rx_opt->tstamp_ok = rx_opt->sack_ok = rx_opt->wscale_ok = rx_opt->snd_wscale = 0; >> + rx_opt->tstamp_ok = rx_opt->sack_ok = 0; >> + rx_opt->wscale_ok = rx_opt->snd_wscale = 0; >> + rx_opt->cookie_plus = 0; >> } >> > > Why not get the coding style correct wrt. long lines in patch #3 where > you initially added this function, rather than fixing it here as you > add the new ->cookie_plus assignment? > Documentation/SubmittingPatches at 619: One significant exception is when moving code from one file to another -- in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in the same patch which moves it. This clearly delineates the act of moving the code and your changes. This greatly aids review of the actual differences and allows tools to better track the history of the code itself. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists