[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19210.42270.233337.986217@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:07:10 +0100
From: robert@...julf.net
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Hackers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Olsson <robert@...julf.net>
Subject: Strange CPU load when flushing route cache (kernel 2.6.31.6)
Jesper Dangaard Brouer writes:
> I have observed a strange route cache behaviour when I upgraded some
> of my production Linux routers (1Gbit/s tg3) to kernel 2.6.31.6 (from
> kernel 2.6.25.7).
>
> Every time the route cache is flushed I get a CPU spike (in softirq)
> with a tail. I have attached some graphs that illustrate the issue
> (hope vger.kernel.org will allow these attachments...)
Nice plots. Yes had the same problem long time. Packets were dropped on
even moderately loaded machines and the network managers were complaining.
Also the are some router benchmarks (RFC??) that estimates the forwarding
performance to the level when the first packet drop occurs. One can of course
discuss such test but it's there...
IMO is best to have he GC "inlined" with the creation of new flows and avoid
periodic tasks in this aspect.
Also I tried with something I called "active" garbage collection. The idea
was to get hints from TCP-FIN etc when to remove stale entries to take a
more pro-active approach. I think this was mentioned in the TRASH-paper.
If you only do routing you might try to disable the route cache.
Cheers
--ro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists