netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:19:32 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current
 tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:00:52 +1100

> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
> drivers/ieee802154/fakehard.c between commit
> 56cf54831fd1be105e89a9df899e3b22442da180 ("ieee802154: dont leak skbs in
> ieee802154_fake_xmit()") from the net-current tree and commit
> 8964be4a9a5ca8cab1219bb046db2f6d1936227c ("net: rename skb->iif to
> skb->skb_iif") from the net tree.
> 
> The former removed the code modified by the latter, so I used the former.

Hmmm... I specifically remember taking core of this conflict when I
merged net-next-2.6 into net-2.6 yesterday or the day before.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html