[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091123190644.574e806c@werewolf.home>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:06:44 +0100
From: "J.A. Magallón" <jamagallon@....com>
To: NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Performance of bonding driver with e1000
Hi...
I have two boxes which I linked together via 2x gigabit interfaces and a
3Com switch. Each interface is:
02:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82541EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller
02:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82541EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller
I use the e1000 driver.
The switch is private for them, so there is no more taffic.
Boxes are P4-HT@2.8, 3Gb of RAM.
Both interfaces alone work pretty well (performance measured with iperf):
[ 5] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 41252
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.00 GBytes 860 Mbits/sec
[ 4] local 192.168.2.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.2.1 port 39275
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1024 MBytes 858 Mbits/sec
I loaded bonding driver with no parameters, and using iperf I get:
[ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 41254
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 741 MBytes 621 Mbits/sec
In the node which receives, two instances of iftop on slave interfaces
show that load is balanced, but none flies higher than about 300 Mb/s.
Any ideas ?
If you guess something and need more info, I will provide it.
TIA
--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()ono!com> \ Software is like sex:
\ It's better when it's free
Mandriva Linux release 2010.0 (Cooker) for x86_64
Linux 2.6.29.3-desktop-1mnb (gcc 4.3.2 (GCC) #1 Wed May
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists