netdev - Re: NUMA and multiQ interation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091124.121017.231454645.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:10:17 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	therbert@...gle.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NUMA and multiQ interation

From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:51:39 -0800

> I saw that thread, and it looks compelling.  But we have applications
> that are network bound such that we want to use multiple queues across
> multiple nodes for scaling-- and trying keep all queues on the same
> node does not scale very well.  Maybe ignoring NUMA allocation could
> be a fall-back mode in a dynamic allocation with heavy load?

You use the word "But" as if what PJ and friends are doing is different
from what you're trying to achive.  I think they are the same.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html