netdev - Re: [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance hints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1259051972.2631.12.camel@ppwaskie-mobl2>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:39:32 -0800
From:	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"arjan@...ux.jf.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter
 irqbalance hints

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:17 -0700, Yong Zhang wrote:
> [snip]
> >>
> >> 1) I think you should consider CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK which will affect
> >>    node_affinity.
> >> 2) It seems like this patch can't work with SPARSE_IRQ.
> >
> > This mechanism isn't going to be used by any internal kernel mechanism
> > for determining interrupt placement or operation.  It's purely something
> > that either a driver can modify, or external script (through /proc),
> > that irqbalance will make use of.  If irqbalance isn't running, or the
> > current version of irqbalance doesn't support reading node_affinity,
> > then it won't affect the system's operation.
> >
> > If irqbalance does support it, it'll read whatever the supplied mask is,
> > and then will try and balance interrupts within that mask.  It will bail
> > if the mask is invalid, or won't apply to the running system, just like
> > how putting a bogus mask into smp_affinity is ignored.
> >
> > If there's something I'm missing beyond this with the two suggestions
> > you've made (I looked into those two parameters and tried to draw
> > conclusions), please let me know.
> 
> My two suggestions are both about your adding node_affinity. Before you can
> use this element, you must initialise it firstly. You can refer how
> irq_desc::affinity
> is used in function alloc_desc_masks().
> include/linux/irq.h:
> static inline bool alloc_desc_masks(struct irq_desc *desc, int node,
> 							bool boot)
> {
> 	gfp_t gfp = GFP_ATOMIC;
> 
> 	if (boot)
> 		gfp = GFP_NOWAIT;
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
> 	if (!alloc_cpumask_var_node(&desc->affinity, gfp, node))
> 		return false;
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
> 	if (!alloc_cpumask_var_node(&desc->pending_mask, gfp, node)) {
> 		free_cpumask_var(desc->affinity);
> 		return false;
> 	}
> #endif
> #endif
> 	return true;
> }
> 

Ah, ok.  I see what you were referring to now.  Let me respin the patch
and send a second version.

Thanks Yong,

-PJ Waskiewicz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html