netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Defer skb allocation for both mergeable buffers and big packets in virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091125114029.GA9333@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:40:29 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Defer skb allocation for both mergeable buffers
	and big packets in virtio_net

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:50:21PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:45:30 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Hmm, is it really worth it to save a header copy if it's linear?  We are
> > going to access it anyway, and it fits into one cacheline nicely.  On
> > the other hand we have more code making life harder for compiler and
> > processor.
> 
> Not sure: I think there would be many places where it would be useful.
> 
> We do a similar thing in the kernel to inspect non-linear packets, and
> it's served us well.

You mean this gives measureable speedup? Okay ...

> Cheers,
> Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html