[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1259232716.30983.101.camel@jdb-workstation>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:51:56 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>,
Linux Kernel Network Hackers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Olsson <robert@...julf.net>
Subject: Re: Strange CPU load when flushing route cache (kernel 2.6.31.6)
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 15:03 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > grep LowTotal /proc/meminfo
> > LowTotal: 747080 kB
> >
> > What does that mean? Is it bad? What should I run on a 32-bit
> > system/kernel?
>
> If you have more than 1GB of physical ram, and use your machine as a router, you might
> compile a 2GB/2GB User/Kernel kernel, to get twice available RAM for kernel
> and more IP route entries (if needed)
Can I still use this option if the machine "only" have 2G of physical
RAM? Most of my production machines have 2G RAM.
Just to verify: This is not an issue on 64-bit kernels right?
> make menuconfig
> --> Processor type and features
> --> Memory split
> --> 2G/2G
For completeness sake, Memory split depends on "if EMBEDDED"
So I also needed to enable:
make menuconfig
--> General setup
--> Configure standard kernel features (for small systems)
> > Can you recommend any other /proc/sys/ tuning options?
>
> Really hard to say without exact context of use :)
The machines does Internet traffic routing, but with a VERY large
iptables rulesets, e.g. on one production machine I have 18409 chains
and 62916 iptables rules. (I did most of the scalability patches to
iptables userspace to make this work...). And the machines also uses a
very large HTB tree. Basically I do, per customer, Access Control,
Bandwidth limiting and Personal firewall.
Also note that I'm reserving extra vmalloc memory as iptables uses
vmalloc'ed memory...
> > Does my kernel boot option rhash_entries=262143 make sense anymore?
> > Or do we adjust the hash bucket size dynamically these days?
> >
>
> Its not dynamic yet.
Okay I'll keep boot parameter then... or is it possible to resize the
hash runtime?
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Jesper Brouer
ComX Networks A/S
Linux Network Kernel Developer
Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.CS
Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists