[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911301408.33297.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:08:33 +0200
From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] net: NETDEV_UNREGISTER_PERNET -> NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH
On Monday 30 November 2009 03:45:58 you wrote:
> + /* Process any work delayed until the end of the batch */
> + dev = list_entry(head->next, struct net_device, unreg_list);
> + call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH, dev);
>
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, aux, head, unreg_list) {
> - int new_net = 1;
> - list_for_each_entry(fdev, &pernet_list, unreg_list) {
> - if (net_eq(dev_net(dev), dev_net(fdev))) {
> - new_net = 0;
> - dev_put(dev);
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - if (new_net)
> - list_move(&dev->unreg_list, &pernet_list);
> - }
>
This implies that the devices we want to batch unregister needs to be part of
the same namespace. It might be worth mentioning that in the
unregister_netdevice_many() function comments.
And, fortunately, it seems that all of the current batch unregister users
comply with this requirement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists