netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/20] Batch network namespace cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1259585043.873.21.camel@bigi>
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:44:03 -0500
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/20] Batch network namespace cleanup

On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 17:46 -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> Recently Jamal and Daniel perform some experiments and found that
> large numbers of network namespace exiting simultaneously is very
> inefficient.  24+ minutes in some configurations.  The cpu overhead
> was negligible but it results in long hold times of net_mutex, and
> memory being consumed a long time after the last user has gone away.
> 
> I looked into it and discovered that by batching network namespace
> cleanups I can reduce the time for 4k network namespaces exiting from
> 5-7 minutes in my configuration to 44 seconds.

Excellent work Eric. I have time today so i can test these patches
status quo vs.
This is against net-next?

cheers,
jamal



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html