netdev - Re: SIP proxying: siproxd vs. Netfilter SIP nat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0911301133280.17037@router.home>
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:35:59 -0600 (CST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
cc:	Christian Hentschel <chentschel@...et.com.ar>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SIP proxying: siproxd vs. Netfilter SIP nat

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> > Where do I find more recent documentation?
>
> Below :)

I found http://lwn.net/Articles/271597/ which mentions that those two
values may be set too strictly. Can they default to zero?

> You of course also need to accept the packets marked RELATED by
> the helper. If this is missing it might result in one-way audio.

Firewall is configured to accept all udp traffic. Will that do it?

The "helper" is the conntrack module?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html