netdev - Re: scp stalls mysteriously

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0911302325500.9826@melkinpaasi.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:26:55 +0200 (EET)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	Frederic Leroy <fredo@...rox.org>
cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Asdo <asdo@...ftmail.org>
Subject: Re: scp stalls mysteriously

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Frederic Leroy wrote:

> Le Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:18:22 +0200 (EET),
> "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> a écrit :
> 
> > On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Frederic Leroy wrote:
> > 
> > > Le Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:31:14 +0200 (EET),
> > > "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> a écrit :
> > point out to yet another problem, however, I'm not sure what I can
> > atm trust in the logs. ...Timestamps would probably help me a bit
> > (I've changed also sleep to do 0.01 granularity):
> 
> I made 2 other traces with 0.01 granularity, but it works normally. I
> suppose there are less interference in the evening.
> 
> The .4 is a bad trace where I forgot to put timestamp. And when I
> realized it was copying successfully, I stopped it before it tooks too
> much space.
> 
> It can be interesting because the stream had a little "pause".
> 
> The .5 is the trace of a successfull copy. I limited packet capture size
> to 96 bytes. It has stalled once in the middle.

Could you compress such big ones. ...I only have 1Mbps downlink here :-).

-- 
 i.