[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091130.155524.31786099.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:55:24 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hadi@...erus.ca, dlezcano@...ibm.com,
adobriyan@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net, opurdila@...acom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] net: NETDEV_UNREGISTER_PERNET ->
NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:42:13 -0800
> So it appears to me that moving the final syncrhonize_net() back
> where it was before the NETDEV_UNREGISTER_PERNET changes (as I did)
> is necessary for correctness.
Ok, it appears your right. Thanks for the analysis.
I'll look over the rest of your series now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists