netdev - Re: Netlink event for network device statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1259674574.4421.15.camel@violet>
Date:	Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:36:14 +0100
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Netlink event for network device statistics

Hi Patrick,

> > so I was playing with monitoring network device statistics and storing
> > them over a period of time. While netlink and ethtool provides all the
> > network packet statistics, I have a problem with devices that are
> > actually hotplug. Especially 3G cards that get taken off the bus via
> > RFKILL and external dongles that can be unplugged at any time.
> > 
> > So I was thinking that before we send the DELLINK netlink event for that
> > interface, we should send the latest statistic details via netlink. Is
> > that a good idea or is there another way to get up-to-date statistics
> > without polling for them?
> 
> Don't we already include them in the DELLINK message? rtnl_fill_ifinfo()
> unconditionally includes the statistics.

you are correct. We already have the IFLA_STATS in DELLINK. I got
confused with ip monitor not decoding these and assumed they were not
included at all.

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html