[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1259876628.8991.7.camel@HP1>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:43:48 -0800
From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
To: "Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] bnx2: Read firmware version from VPD.
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 12:17 -0800, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > + for (i = 0; i < 128; i += 4) {
> > + data[i] = data[i + 131];
> > + data[i + 1] = data[i + 130];
> > + data[i + 2] = data[i + 129];
> > + data[i + 3] = data[i + 128];
> > + }
>
> Is this correct for both big-endian and little-endian architectures?
Yes, the nvram function returns data in a byte-stream that is the same
in little or big endian.
> Perhaps these VPD tag values should go in pci_regs.h.
How about we do this later and convert other drivers at the same time?
I will send out a fixup patch shortly incorporating all your other
suggestions. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists