[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091204114147.GA8488@ff.dom.local>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:41:47 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"mchan@...adcom.com" <mchan@...adcom.com>,
"kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: Introduce realloc_netdev_mq()
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 02:51:38AM -0800, Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote:
> Honestly, there's no reason we can't know how many Tx queues we'll have
> prior to registering the netdev. All of this should be figured out
> after ixgbe_alloc_queues() and ixgbe_init_interrupt_scheme() are called.
>
> Once we know what features are enabled, and how many MSI-X vectors the
> platform gives us, we can make the call for how many queues to allocate.
Yes. It seems, it's more about cleaning/reordering a few things
sometimes.
>
> I like this realloc_netdev_mq() mechanism. I'm going to pull that into
> my tree for testing, since I unfortunately was unaware it existed (lack
> of my poking around). This is good stuff.
Actually, it's only a simple separation of functionality, no big deal,
but thanks. Since it's still a part of RFC feel free to make it better
or even different way.
Cheers,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists