[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1260008979.3565.25.camel@localhost>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:29:39 -0800
From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: how to control device specific features. sysfs or mod
param?
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 02:25 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:22:53 -0800
>
> > Yes, I looked at either ethtool or extending any of the existing
> > rtnetlink interfaces. But my problem with those is this setting is very
> > specific to my hardware, and I'm not sure anyone else could benefit from
> > this.
> >
> > I could try and make it as generic as possible, say pass a 32 or 64-bit
> > generic bitfield to a driver through an ethtool operation, and each
> > driver would apply some secret sauce based on the bitfield?
>
> We support device specific statistics in a nice way in ethtool, why
> don't we do something similar for device specific settings?
>
> A variable length array of names (strings) and values.
>
> This is pretty straightforward for what %99.9999 of uses will be,
> boolean enables. If we make the value type a u32 we can handle pretty
> much all the other cases as well.
That does make sense. I'll try and put something together to make this
work.
Thanks Dave,
-PJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists