[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1260035440.11126.50.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:50:40 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Cc: Brice Goglin <brice@...i.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] drivers/net: Move && and || to end of
previous line
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 07:43 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 14:10 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> >> Joe Perches wrote:
> >>> Only files where David Miller is the primary git-signer.
> >>> wireless, wimax, ixgbe, etc are not modified.
> >> What's the point? Having them at the beginning of the next line is
> >> easier to read from my point of view.
> > It's just a stupid consistency thing.
> Joe *agrees* that
> having them on the beginning of the line is preferred.
This is not true.
I prefer code that I write for myself to
use leading continuation tests.
For the Linux code, as should be obvious
from the patches I submit, I prefer to
have adherence to one predominant majority
style. I don't much care what form that
style actually takes.
> Thousands of
> contributors throughout the tree agree.
> This is entirely a Miller thing.
Nope. There have been many efforts to
help standardize on single form styles.
> My main objection to these sweeping patches is that it makes it much
> more difficult to maintain and apply patches across different versions of
> the tree.
I think you underestimate the value of
standardization and overestimate the
quantity of work to sort it out for
the -stable versions.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists