netdev - Re: 2.6.32 regression, hard lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091208004221.GA15968@hexapodia.org>
Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:42:21 -0800
From:	Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Richard Zidlicky <rz@...ux-m68k.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.32 regression, hard lock

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:30:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> btw, why does your kernel say "To Be Filled By O.E.M." in the traces? 
> The kernel.org kernel doesn't do that.  Is that kernel patched at all?

That's traditional for DMI_PRODUCT_NAME in dodgy vendor BIOSes.  I
routinely see it on Intel evaluation boards and less frequently on
Taiwanese Brand X boards.

-andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html