lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:47:20 -0800
From:	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc:	NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ixgbe funkiness after OOM

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 17:12 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> Kernel: 2.6.31.7, plus hacks
> Fedora 11, 64-bit
> ixgbe NIC is 82699 chipset, 5GT/s 8-lane pcie, not manufactured by Intel.
> CPU:  Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         965  @ 3.20GHz
> 
> I've been running some tests with 10k tcp connections (to self), over
> a 2-port ixgbe NIC.  First..I managed to OOM my 12GB system..perhaps because
> I have tcp memory settings too high or something (though I was not actually
> setting the tcp rcv/tx buffers for the sockets.)  ixgbe was unable to do
> order 0 allocations.
> 
> When this happened, the ixgbe NICs got into a state where they could not
> tx any packets:  tshark showed ARPs going out on eth2, but the tx pkt counters
> for that NIC did not increase and the peer (eth3, other port on this NIC),
> did not show any rx pkts.
> 
> I tried doing ifdown/ifup, but that didn't have much affect (eth3 bumped it's tx counter by 1).
> 
> I then tried to rmmod the NIC and re-load the driver.  This time, it really looks unhappy:
> 
> 
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI Express Network Driver - version 2.0.34-k2
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe: Copyright (c) 1999-2009 Intel Corporation.
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: HW Init failed: -12
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: PCI INT A disabled
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe: probe of 0000:03:00.0 failed with error -12
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe: 0000:03:00.1: ixgbe_init_interrupt_scheme: Multiqueue Enabled: Rx Queue count = 8, Tx Queue count = 8
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.1: (PCI Express:5.0Gb/s:Width x4) 00:0c:bd:00:90:19
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.1: MAC: 2, PHY: 9, SFP+: 5, PBA No: ffffff-0ff
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.1: PCI-Express bandwidth available for this card is not sufficient for optimal performance.
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.1: For optimal performance a x8 PCI-Express slot is required.
> Dec  8 15:27:57 localhost kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.1: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit Network Connection
> 
> 
> At this point, there is 8GB of free RAM, and no obvious OOM issues showing up in the logs.
> 
> It looks like error -12 means:
> 
> IXGBE_ERR_MASTER_REQUESTS_PENDING
> 

We have a fix coming for this issue.  Basically we have PCIe
transactions that haven't completed when a reset shows up, and are
wedged in the PCIe block.  We have a way to whack the hardware the right
way to get these pending transactions cleared, which allows the device
to finish its reset correctly.

I'll try and get that patch fast-tracked through our testing.  But if
this issue is easily reproducible for you, I can send you the patch in
the meantime to see if it helps your situation, while we finish our test
pass and push to netdev.

Cheers,
-PJ

> 
> I tried rmmod/modprobe several more times...each time I get the same error for
> that device.  The one that fails is eth2, the same that could not tx earlier.
> 
> Everything came up fine on reboot.
> 
> Anyway, this is mostly just for information in case someone else is hitting similar
> issues.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ben
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists