netdev - Re: [PATCH] netfilter: Fix compiler warning.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.01.0912101953360.23791@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:53:58 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Laurent Chavey <chavey@...gle.com>
cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: Fix compiler warning.


On Donnerstag 2009-12-10 18:50, Laurent Chavey wrote:
>
>good point.  I  agree with the need for the exception, I would just
>like it to be more explicit in the code itself (like a turn off
>check around that particular statement) so we do not have to scrub
>thru the compiler output to filter out good / bad warning. question:
>  why do we not force the timestamp in the skb before going thru the
>chain ?

Because it is probably too expensive to do, unless you employ
things like xt_time?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html