netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] tcp: Remove unrequired operations in tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:36:46 +0530
From:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tcp: Remove unrequired operations in tcp_push()

"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote on 12/10/2009 01:40:51
PM:

> Re: [PATCH 2/3] tcp: Remove unrequired operations in tcp_push()
>
>
> >  static inline void tcp_push(struct sock *sk, int flags, int mss_now,
> >               int nonagle)
> >  {
> > -   struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> > -
> >     if (tcp_send_head(sk)) {
> > -      struct sk_buff *skb = tcp_write_queue_tail(sk);
> > -      if (!(flags & MSG_MORE) || forced_push(tp))
> > +      struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> > +
> > +      if (!(flags & MSG_MORE) || forced_push(tp)) {
> > +         struct sk_buff *skb = tcp_write_queue_tail(sk);
> > +
> >           tcp_mark_push(tp, skb);
>
> I suppose one could kill the temporary variable completely then?

I did consider that, but kept it this way for readability reasons.
Should I change it?

Thanks,

- KK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html