[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c17e3570912100214k4b3eb038u1108c82bfa346389@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:14:24 +0800
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"H.J. Oertel" <oe@...t.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] add the driver for Analog Devices Blackfin on-chip CAN
controllers
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com> wrote:
> Barry Song wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: H.J. Oertel <oe@...t.de>
>> ---
>> -v3: use structures to describe the layout of registers
>
> Wow, that was quick, thanks for your effort and patience.
>
> Please use checkpath.pl to detect the obvious coding style problems,
> especially the "WARNING: line over 80 characters".
>
> I also think the declaration of reg should have the __iomem as well:
>
> struct bfin_can_regs __iomem *reg = priv->membase;
>
>> drivers/net/can/Kconfig | 9 +
>> drivers/net/can/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/net/can/bfin_can.c | 836 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 846 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/bfin_can.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
>> index bb803fa..8c485aa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
>> @@ -54,6 +54,15 @@ config CAN_MCP251X
>> ---help---
>> Driver for the Microchip MCP251x SPI CAN controllers.
>>
>> +config CAN_BFIN
>> + depends on CAN_DEV && (BF534 || BF536 || BF537 || BF538 || BF539 || BF54x)
>> + tristate "Analog Devices Blackfin on-chip CAN"
>> + ---help---
>> + Driver for the Analog Devices Blackfin on-chip CAN controllers
>> +
>> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
>> + module will be called bfin_can.
>> +
>> source "drivers/net/can/mscan/Kconfig"
>>
>> source "drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig"
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Makefile b/drivers/net/can/Makefile
>> index 56899fe..7a702f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/Makefile
>> @@ -14,5 +14,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_MSCAN) += mscan/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_AT91) += at91_can.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_TI_HECC) += ti_hecc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_MCP251X) += mcp251x.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_BFIN) += bfin_can.o
>>
>> ccflags-$(CONFIG_CAN_DEBUG_DEVICES) := -DDEBUG
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/bfin_can.c b/drivers/net/can/bfin_can.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b94169d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/bfin_can.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,836 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Blackfin On-Chip CAN Driver
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2004-2009 Analog Devices Inc.
>
> Consider adding your copyright here, with a name and address.
>
>> + *
>> + * Enter bugs at http://blackfin.uclinux.org/
>> + *
>> + * Licensed under the GPL-2 or later.
>
> Please add the usual "GPL-2 or later" bla-bla here.
Here I am not completely sure. But I am sure I am using the head file
template of ADI which has been used widely in kernel and should be
right.
>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> I think you don't need "types.h" as the code no longer uses "uint*_t".
>
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/netdevice.h>
>> +#include <linux/skbuff.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +
>> +#include <linux/can.h>
>> +#include <linux/can/dev.h>
>> +#include <linux/can/error.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/portmux.h>
>> +
>> +#define DRV_NAME "bfin_can"
>> +#define BFIN_CAN_TIMEOUT 100
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * transmit and receive channels
>> + */
>> +#define TRANSMIT_CHL 24
>> +#define RECEIVE_STD_CHL 0
>> +#define RECEIVE_EXT_CHL 4
>> +#define RECEIVE_RTR_CHL 8
>> +#define RECEIVE_EXT_RTR_CHL 12
>> +#define MAX_CHL_NUMBER 32
>
> The alignment of the numbers is inconsistant.
>
>> +/*
>> + * bfin can registers layout
>> + */
>> +struct bfin_can_mask_regs {
>> + u16 aml;
>> + u16 dummy1;
>> + u16 amh;
>> + u16 dummy2;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct bfin_can_channel_regs {
>> + u16 data[8];
>> + u16 dlc;
>> + u16 dummy1;
>> + u16 tsv;
>> + u16 dummy2;
>> + u16 id0;
>> + u16 dummy3;
>> + u16 id1;
>> + u16 dummy4;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct bfin_can_regs {
>> + /*
>> + * global control and status registers
>> + */
>> + u16 mc1; /* offset 0 */
>> + u16 dummy1;
>> + u16 md1; /* offset 4 */
>> + u16 rsv1[13];
>> + u16 mbtif1; /* offset 0x20 */
>> + u16 dummy2;
>> + u16 mbrif1; /* offset 0x24 */
>> + u16 dummy3;
>> + u16 mbim1; /* offset 0x28 */
>> + u16 rsv2[11];
>
> Ditto.
>
>> + u16 mc2; /* offset 0x40 */
>> + u16 dummy4;
>> + u16 md2; /* offset 0x44 */
>> + u16 dummy5;
>> + u16 trs2; /* offset 0x48 */
>> + u16 rsv3[11];
>> + u16 mbtif2; /* offset 0x60 */
>> + u16 dummy6;
>> + u16 mbrif2; /* offset 0x64 */
>> + u16 dummy7;
>> + u16 mbim2; /* offset 0x68 */
>> + u16 rsv4[11];
>> + u16 clk; /* offset 0x80 */
>> + u16 dummy8;
>> + u16 timing; /* offset 0x84 */
>> + u16 rsv5[3];
>> + u16 status; /* offset 0x8c */
>> + u16 dummy9;
>> + u16 cec; /* offset 0x90 */
>> + u16 dummy10;
>> + u16 gis; /* offset 0x94 */
>> + u16 dummy11;
>> + u16 gim; /* offset 0x98 */
>> + u16 rsv6[3];
>> + u16 ctrl; /* offset 0xa0 */
>> + u16 dummy12;
>> + u16 intr; /* offset 0xa4 */
>> + u16 rsv7[7];
>> + u16 esr; /* offset 0xb4 */
>> + u16 rsv8[37];
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * channel(mailbox) mask and message registers
>> + */
>> + struct bfin_can_mask_regs msk[MAX_CHL_NUMBER]; /* offset 0x100 */
>
> Don't align "msk", please.
>
>> + struct bfin_can_channel_regs chl[MAX_CHL_NUMBER]; /* offset 0x200 */
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * bfin can private data
>> + */
>> +struct bfin_can_priv {
>> + struct can_priv can; /* must be the first member */
>> + struct net_device *dev;
>> + void __iomem *membase;
>> + int rx_irq;
>> + int tx_irq;
>> + int err_irq;
>> + unsigned short *pin_list;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * bfin can timing parameters
>> + */
>> +static struct can_bittiming_const bfin_can_bittiming_const = {
>> + .name = DRV_NAME,
>> + .tseg1_min = 1,
>> + .tseg1_max = 16,
>> + .tseg2_min = 1,
>> + .tseg2_max = 8,
>> + .sjw_max = 4,
>> + /* Although the BRP field can be set to any value, it is recommended
>
> Should be:
>
> /*
> * Although the ...
>
>
>> + * that the value be greater than or equal to 4, as restrictions
>> + * apply to the bit timing configuration when BRP is less than 4.
>> + */
>> + .brp_min = 4,
>> + .brp_max = 1024,
>> + .brp_inc = 1,
>> +};
>
> Well, I'm still not a friend of the following inline functions,
> especially the *one-liners* which are called just *once*. With the usage
> of structs they seem even more useless.
>
>> +/*
>> + * inline functions to read/write ID, data length and payload of CAN frame
>> + */
>> +static inline void bfin_can_write_oid(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel, canid_t id)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> +
>> + writew((id << 2) + AME, ®->chl[channel].id1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void bfin_can_write_oid_rtr(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel, canid_t id)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> +
>> + writew((id << 2) + AME + RTR, ®->chl[channel].id1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline canid_t bfin_can_read_oid(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> +
>> + return (readw(®->chl[channel].id1) & 0x1ffc) >> 2;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void bfin_can_write_xoid(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel, canid_t id)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> +
>> + writew(id, ®->chl[channel].id0);
>> + writew(((id & 0x1FFF0000) >> 16) + IDE + AME, ®->chl[channel].id1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void bfin_can_write_xoid_rtr(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel, canid_t id)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> +
>> + writew(id, ®->chl[channel].id0);
>> + writew(((id & 0x1FFF0000) >> 16) + IDE + AME + RTR, ®->chl[channel].id1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline canid_t bfin_can_read_xoid(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> +
>> + return ((readw(®->chl[channel].id1) & 0x1FFF) << 16) + readw(®->chl[channel].id0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void bfin_can_write_dlc(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel, u8 dlc)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> +
>> + writew(dlc, ®->chl[channel].dlc);
>> +}
>
> Look, "writew(dlc, ®->chl[channel].dlc)" makes already pretty clear
> what the call does.
>
>> +static inline u8 bfin_can_read_dlc(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> +
>> + return readw(®->chl[channel].dlc);
>> +}
>
> Ditto.
>
>> +static inline void bfin_can_write_data(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel, u8 *data, u8 dlc)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + int i;
>> + u16 val;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 8; i += 2) {
>> + val = ((7 - i) < dlc ? (data[7 - i]) : 0) +
>> + ((6 - i) < dlc ? (data[6 - i] << 8) : 0);
>> + writew(val, ®->chl[channel].data[i]);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void bfin_can_read_data(struct bfin_can_priv *priv, int channel, u8 *data, u8 dlc)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + int i;
>> + u16 val;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 8; i += 2) {
>> + val = readw(®->chl[channel].data[i]);
>> + data[7 - i] = (7 - i) < dlc ? val : 0;
>> + data[6 - i] = (6 - i) < dlc ? (val >> 8) : 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int bfin_can_set_bittiming(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + struct can_bittiming *bt = &priv->can.bittiming;
>> + u16 clk, timing;
>> +
>> + clk = bt->brp - 1;
>> + timing = ((bt->sjw - 1) << 8) | (bt->prop_seg + bt->phase_seg1 - 1) |
>> + ((bt->phase_seg2 - 1) << 4);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the SAM bit is set, the input signal is oversampled three times at the SCLK rate.
>> + */
>> + if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_3_SAMPLES)
>> + timing |= SAM;
>> +
>> + writew(clk, ®->clk);
>> + writew(timing, ®->timing);
>> +
>> + dev_info(dev->dev.parent, "setting CLOCK=0x%04x TIMING=0x%04x\n", clk, timing);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void bfin_can_set_reset_mode(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + int timeout = BFIN_CAN_TIMEOUT;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /* disable interrupts */
>> + writew(0, ®->mbim1);
>> + writew(0, ®->mbim2);
>> + writew(0, ®->gim);
>> +
>> + /* reset can and enter configuration mode */
>> + writew(SRS | CCR, ®->ctrl);
>> + SSYNC();
>> + writew(CCR, ®->ctrl);
>> + SSYNC();
>> + while (!(readw(®->ctrl) & CCA)) {
>> + udelay(10);
>> + if (--timeout == 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev->dev.parent, "fail to enter configuration mode\n");
>> + BUG();
>> + }
>> + }
>
> Isn't using BUG() to harsh here? Using and handling a proper return code
> might already be sufficient.
Due to the hardware design, here timeout will never happen. If it
happens, that means hardware component has crashed.
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * All mailbox configurations are marked as inactive
>> + * by writing to CAN Mailbox Configuration Registers 1 and 2
>> + * For all bits: 0 - Mailbox disabled, 1 - Mailbox enabled
>> + */
>> + writew(0, ®->mc1);
>> + writew(0, ®->mc2);
>> +
>> + /* Set Mailbox Direction */
>> + writew(0xFFFF, ®->md1); /* mailbox 1-16 are RX */
>> + writew(0, ®->md2); /* mailbox 17-32 are TX */
>> +
>> + /* RECEIVE_STD_CHL */
>> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>> + writew(0, ®->chl[RECEIVE_STD_CHL + i].id0);
>> + writew(AME, ®->chl[RECEIVE_STD_CHL + i].id1);
>> + writew(0, ®->chl[RECEIVE_STD_CHL + i].dlc);
>> + writew(0x1FFF, ®->msk[RECEIVE_STD_CHL + i].amh);
>> + writew(0xFFFF, ®->msk[RECEIVE_STD_CHL + i].aml);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* RECEIVE_EXT_CHL */
>> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>> + writew(0, ®->chl[RECEIVE_EXT_CHL + i].id0);
>> + writew(AME | IDE, ®->chl[RECEIVE_EXT_CHL + i].id1);
>> + writew(0, ®->chl[RECEIVE_EXT_CHL + i].dlc);
>> + writew(0x1FFF, ®->msk[RECEIVE_EXT_CHL + i].amh);
>> + writew(0xFFFF, ®->msk[RECEIVE_EXT_CHL + i].aml);
>> + }
>> +
>> + writew(BIT(TRANSMIT_CHL - 16), ®->mc2);
>> + writew(BIT(RECEIVE_STD_CHL) + BIT(RECEIVE_EXT_CHL), ®->mc1);
>> + SSYNC();
>> +
>> + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void bfin_can_set_normal_mode(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + int timeout = BFIN_CAN_TIMEOUT;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * leave configuration mode
>> + */
>> + writew(readw(®->ctrl) & ~CCR, ®->ctrl);
>> +
>> + while (readw(®->status) & CCA) {
>> + udelay(10);
>> + if (--timeout == 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev->dev.parent, "fail to leave configuration mode\n");
>> + BUG();
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * clear _All_ tx and rx interrupts
>> + */
>> + writew(0xFFFF, ®->mbtif1);
>> + writew(0xFFFF, ®->mbtif2);
>> + writew(0xFFFF, ®->mbrif1);
>> + writew(0xFFFF, ®->mbrif2);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * clear global interrupt status register
>> + */
>> + writew(0x7FF, ®->gis); /* overwrites with '1' */
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Initialize Interrupts
>> + * - set bits in the mailbox interrupt mask register
>> + * - global interrupt mask
>> + */
>> + writew(BIT(RECEIVE_STD_CHL) + BIT(RECEIVE_EXT_CHL), ®->mbim1);
>> + writew(BIT(TRANSMIT_CHL - 16), ®->mbim2);
>> +
>> + writew(EPIM | BOIM | RMLIM, ®->gim);
>> + SSYNC();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void bfin_can_start(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> +
>> + /* leave reset mode */
>> + if (priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_STOPPED)
>> + bfin_can_set_reset_mode(dev);
>> +
>> + /* leave reset mode */
>> + bfin_can_set_normal_mode(dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int bfin_can_set_mode(struct net_device *dev, enum can_mode mode)
>> +{
>> + switch (mode) {
>> + case CAN_MODE_START:
>> + bfin_can_start(dev);
>> + if (netif_queue_stopped(dev))
>> + netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int bfin_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
>> + u8 dlc;
>> + canid_t id;
>> +
>> + netif_stop_queue(dev);
>> +
>> + dlc = cf->can_dlc;
>> + id = cf->can_id;
>> +
>> + /* fill id and data length code */
>> + if (id & CAN_EFF_FLAG) {
>> + if (id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)
>> + bfin_can_write_xoid_rtr(priv, TRANSMIT_CHL, id);
>> + else
>> + bfin_can_write_xoid(priv, TRANSMIT_CHL, id);
>> + } else {
>> + if (id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)
>> + bfin_can_write_oid_rtr(priv, TRANSMIT_CHL, id);
>> + else
>> + bfin_can_write_oid(priv, TRANSMIT_CHL, id);
>> + }
>> +
>> + bfin_can_write_data(priv, TRANSMIT_CHL, cf->data, dlc);
>> +
>> + bfin_can_write_dlc(priv, TRANSMIT_CHL, dlc);
>> +
>> + dev->trans_start = jiffies;
>> +
>> + can_put_echo_skb(skb, dev, 0);
>> +
>> + /* set transmit request */
>> + writew(BIT(TRANSMIT_CHL - 16), ®->trs2);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void bfin_can_rx(struct net_device *dev, u16 isrc)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + struct can_frame *cf;
>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>> + canid_t id;
>> + u8 dlc;
>> + int obj;
>> +
>> + skb = alloc_can_skb(dev, &cf);
>> + if (skb == NULL)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /* get id and data length code */
>> + if (isrc & BIT(RECEIVE_EXT_CHL)) {
>> + /* extended frame format (EFF) */
>> + id = bfin_can_read_xoid(priv, RECEIVE_EXT_CHL);
>> + id |= CAN_EFF_FLAG;
>> + obj = RECEIVE_EXT_CHL;
>> + } else {
>> + /* standard frame format (SFF) */
>> + id = bfin_can_read_oid(priv, RECEIVE_STD_CHL);
>> + obj = RECEIVE_STD_CHL;
>> + }
>> + if (readw(®->chl[obj].id1) & RTR)
>> + id |= CAN_RTR_FLAG;
>> + dlc = bfin_can_read_dlc(priv, obj);
>> +
>> + cf->can_id = id;
>> + cf->can_dlc = dlc;
>> +
>> + bfin_can_read_data(priv, obj, cf->data, dlc);
>> +
>> + netif_rx(skb);
>> +
>> + stats->rx_packets++;
>> + stats->rx_bytes += dlc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int bfin_can_err(struct net_device *dev, u16 isrc, u16 status)
>> +{
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
>> + struct can_frame *cf;
>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>> + enum can_state state = priv->can.state;
>> +
>> + skb = alloc_can_err_skb(dev, &cf);
>> + if (skb == NULL)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + if (isrc & RMLIS) {
>> + /* data overrun interrupt */
>> + dev_dbg(dev->dev.parent, "data overrun interrupt\n");
>> + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
>> + cf->data[1] = CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_OVERFLOW;
>> + stats->rx_over_errors++;
>> + stats->rx_errors++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (isrc & BOIS) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev->dev.parent, "bus-off mode interrupt\n");
>> +
>
> Empty line?
>
>> + state = CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF;
>> + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_BUSOFF;
>> + can_bus_off(dev);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (isrc & EPIS) {
>> + /* error passive interrupt */
>> + dev_dbg(dev->dev.parent, "error passive interrupt\n");
>> + state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((isrc & EWTIS) || (isrc & EWRIS)) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev->dev.parent, "Error Warning Transmit/Receive Interrupt\n");
>> + state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (state != priv->can.state && (state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING ||
>> + state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE)) {
>> + u16 cec = readw(®->cec);
>> + u8 rxerr = cec;
>> + u8 txerr = cec >> 8;
>
> Add an empty line here, please.
>
>> + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
>> + if (state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING) {
>> + priv->can.can_stats.error_warning++;
>> + cf->data[1] = (txerr > rxerr) ?
>> + CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING :
>> + CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
>> + } else {
>> + priv->can.can_stats.error_passive++;
>> + cf->data[1] = (txerr > rxerr) ?
>> + CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE :
>> + CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (status) {
>> + priv->can.can_stats.bus_error++;
>> +
>> + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT | CAN_ERR_BUSERROR;
>> +
>> + if (status & BEF)
>> + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT;
>> + else if (status & FER)
>> + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_FORM;
>> + else if (status & SER)
>> + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_STUFF;
>> + else
>> + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_UNSPEC;
>> + }
>
> Add {} here as well.
{} will cause checkpatch warning if it is given to only one line.
>
>> + priv->can.state = state;
>> +
>> + netif_rx(skb);
>> +
>> + stats->rx_packets++;
>> + stats->rx_bytes += cf->can_dlc;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +irqreturn_t bfin_can_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
>> + u16 status, isrc;
>> +
>> + if ((irq == priv->tx_irq) && readw(®->mbtif2)) {
>> + /* transmission complete interrupt */
>> + writew(0xFFFF, ®->mbtif2);
>> + stats->tx_packets++;
>> + stats->tx_bytes += bfin_can_read_dlc(priv, TRANSMIT_CHL);
>> + can_get_echo_skb(dev, 0);
>> + netif_wake_queue(dev);
>> + } else if ((irq == priv->rx_irq) && readw(®->mbrif1)) {
>> + /* receive interrupt */
>> + isrc = readw(®->mbrif1);
>> + writew(0xFFFF, ®->mbrif1);
>> + bfin_can_rx(dev, isrc);
>> + } else if ((irq == priv->err_irq) && readw(®->gis)) {
>> + /* error interrupt */
>> + isrc = readw(®->gis);
>> + status = readw(®->esr);
>> + writew(0x7FF, ®->gis);
>> + bfin_can_err(dev, isrc, status);
>> + } else
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>
> Use {} here as well.
{} will cause checkpatch warning if it is given to only one line.
>
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int bfin_can_open(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + /* set chip into reset mode */
>> + bfin_can_set_reset_mode(dev);
>> +
>> + /* common open */
>> + err = open_candev(dev);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + /* init and start chi */
>> + bfin_can_start(dev);
>> +
>> + netif_start_queue(dev);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int bfin_can_close(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + netif_stop_queue(dev);
>> + bfin_can_set_reset_mode(dev);
>> +
>> + close_candev(dev);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct net_device *alloc_bfin_candev(void)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *dev;
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv;
>> +
>> + dev = alloc_candev(sizeof(*priv));
>> + if (!dev)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> +
>> + priv->dev = dev;
>> + priv->can.bittiming_const = &bfin_can_bittiming_const;
>> + priv->can.do_set_bittiming = bfin_can_set_bittiming;
>> + priv->can.do_set_mode = bfin_can_set_mode;
>> +
>> + return dev;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct net_device_ops bfin_can_netdev_ops = {
>> + .ndo_open = bfin_can_open,
>> + .ndo_stop = bfin_can_close,
>> + .ndo_start_xmit = bfin_can_start_xmit,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __devinit bfin_can_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> + struct net_device *dev;
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv;
>> + struct resource *res_mem, *rx_irq, *tx_irq, *err_irq;
>> + unsigned short *pdata;
>> +
>> + pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> + if (!pdata) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data provided!\n");
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + res_mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + rx_irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
>> + tx_irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 1);
>> + err_irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 2);
>> + if (!res_mem || !rx_irq || !tx_irq || !err_irq) {
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!request_mem_region(res_mem->start, resource_size(res_mem),
>> + dev_name(&pdev->dev))) {
>> + err = -EBUSY;
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* request peripheral pins */
>> + err = peripheral_request_list(pdata, dev_name(&pdev->dev));
>> + if (err)
>> + goto exit_mem_release;
>> +
>> + dev = alloc_bfin_candev();
>> + if (!dev) {
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto exit_peri_pin_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* register interrupt handler */
>> + err = request_irq(rx_irq->start, &bfin_can_interrupt, 0,
>> + "bfin-can-rx", (void *)dev);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto exit_candev_free;
>> + err = request_irq(tx_irq->start, &bfin_can_interrupt, 0,
>> + "bfin-can-tx", (void *)dev);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto exit_rx_irq_free;
>> + err = request_irq(err_irq->start, &bfin_can_interrupt, 0,
>> + "bfin-can-err", (void *)dev);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto exit_tx_irq_free;
>
> If possible, please request/free IRQs in the open and stop functions.
>
>> + priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + priv->membase = (void __iomem *)res_mem->start;
>> + priv->rx_irq = rx_irq->start;
>> + priv->tx_irq = tx_irq->start;
>> + priv->err_irq = err_irq->start;
>> + priv->pin_list = pdata;
>> + priv->can.clock.freq = get_sclk();
>> +
>> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, dev);
>> + SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + dev->flags |= IFF_ECHO; /* we support local echo */
>> + dev->netdev_ops = &bfin_can_netdev_ops;
>> +
>> + bfin_can_set_reset_mode(dev);
>> +
>> + err = register_candev(dev);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "registering failed (err=%d)\n", err);
>> + goto exit_err_irq_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s device registered (reg_base=%p, rx_irq=%d, tx_irq=%d, err_irq=%d, sclk=%d)\n",
>> + DRV_NAME, (void *)priv->membase, priv->rx_irq, priv->tx_irq, priv->err_irq,
>> + priv->can.clock.freq);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +exit_err_irq_free:
>> + free_irq(err_irq->start, dev);
>> +exit_tx_irq_free:
>> + free_irq(tx_irq->start, dev);
>> +exit_rx_irq_free:
>> + free_irq(rx_irq->start, dev);
>> +exit_candev_free:
>> + free_candev(dev);
>> +exit_peri_pin_free:
>> + peripheral_free_list(pdata);
>> +exit_mem_release:
>> + release_mem_region(res_mem->start, resource_size(res_mem));
>> +exit:
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __devexit bfin_can_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct resource *res;
>> +
>> + bfin_can_set_reset_mode(dev);
>> +
>> + unregister_candev(dev);
>> +
>> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res));
>> +
>> + free_irq(priv->rx_irq, dev);
>> + free_irq(priv->tx_irq, dev);
>> + free_irq(priv->err_irq, dev);
>> + peripheral_free_list(priv->pin_list);
>> +
>> + free_candev(dev);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +static int bfin_can_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t mesg)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> + int timeout = BFIN_CAN_TIMEOUT;
>> +
>> + if (netif_running(dev)) {
>> + /* enter sleep mode */
>> + writew(readw(®->ctrl) | SMR, ®->ctrl);
>> + SSYNC();
>> + while (!(readw(®->intr) & SMACK)) {
>> + udelay(10);
>> + if (--timeout == 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev->dev.parent, "fail to enter sleep mode\n");
>> + BUG();
>> + }
>> + }
>
> It's already the third time that this timeout check is used. A common
> function would make sense.
Every time, the check condition is different and print information
will change. It is ugly to define only one function.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int bfin_can_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct bfin_can_regs *reg = priv->membase;
>> +
>> + if (netif_running(dev)) {
>> + /* leave sleep mode */
>> + writew(0, ®->intr);
>> + SSYNC();
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +#define bfin_can_suspend NULL
>> +#define bfin_can_resume NULL
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver bfin_can_driver = {
>> + .probe = bfin_can_probe,
>> + .remove = __devexit_p(bfin_can_remove),
>> + .suspend = bfin_can_suspend,
>> + .resume = bfin_can_resume,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = DRV_NAME,
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init bfin_can_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_register(&bfin_can_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Remove empty line above, please.
>
>> +module_init(bfin_can_init);
>> +
>> +static void __exit bfin_can_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + platform_driver_unregister(&bfin_can_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Ditto.
>
>> +module_exit(bfin_can_exit);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Blackfin on-chip CAN netdevice driver");
>
> Wolfgang.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists