[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091213234055.GA28340@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:40:55 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Regression in linux 2.6.32 virtio_net seen with
vhost-net
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:25:12PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > When testing vhost-net patches with a guest running linux 2.6.32, i am
> > running into "Unexpected full queue" warning messages from start_xmit() in
> > virtio_net.c causing a lot of requeues and a drastic reduction in throughput.
> >
> > With a guest running 2.6.31, i get guest to host throughput around 7000Mb/s,
> > but it drops to around 3200Mb/s with 2.6.32.
> >
> > I don't see this problem with usermode virtio in qemu, but i get a thruput of
> > only 2700Mb/s with both 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
> >
> > The following patch fixes this problem by dropping the skb and not requeuing
> > to qdisc when it cannot be added to ring buffer. With this patch, i see
> > similar performance as 2.6.31 with vhost-net.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index b9e002f..307cfd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -528,7 +528,11 @@ again:
> > netif_start_queue(dev);
> > goto again;
> > }
> > - return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> > +
> > + /* drop the skb under stress. */
> > + vi->dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > }
>
> This patch only hides the real problem. The issue is that we
> should never start the queue unless we can accomodate a full
> 64KB packet.
>
> In your case, whenever we have the space for a single slot we'd
> start the queue. However, if the head of the queue required more
> than one slot it would immediately return BUSY and stop the queue
> again.
>
> Your patch simply drops the packet (likely to be TSO) which would
> end up upsetting the TCP transmitter.
>
> Please see what a real Ethernet driver (e.g., tg3 or ixgbe) does
> for queue management.
>
> Cheers,
An interesting thing is that
48925e372f04f5e35fec6269127c62b2c71ab794
was supposed to do this already.
> --
> Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
> Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists