[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912161507.53805.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:07:53 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Regression in linux 2.6.32 virtio_net seen with vhost-net
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:02:27 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Right. Hmm. So for this to work we'll need to
> 1. Free skb upon interrupt instead of
> waiting for the next xmit call
> 2. Add API to query free ring capacity
>
> Rusty, sounds like a good plan?
Well, the query stuff is not too bad, but I can't completely convince myself
it's race-free. We don't want to do locking.
A NAPI-style solution seems cleaner, and I'm testing that now.
> We could also extend host to delay interrupt
> until there is sufficient TX capacity
> but of course we also need to support
> old hosts as well.
Xen does this, and I rejected it in favor of simple enable/disable
flags in the original virtio design. It was probably wrong: while the
guest can enable on a "few remaining" heuristic, it's going to have
latency. The host can do a more timely decision.
There's nothing stopping the Host from doing this heuristic today, of
course: the DISABLE flag is advisory only. But let's check the limitations
of the guest-enable approach first?
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists