netdev - Re: [PATCH] ep93xx_eth.c: general cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091216180849.GM1819@mail.wantstofly.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:08:49 +0100
From:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
To:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
Cc:	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ep93xx_eth.c: general cleanup

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:06:10PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:

> >> General cleanup of the ep93xx_eth driver.
> >
> > Apart from keeping DRV_MODULE_NAME and DRV_MODULE_VERSION, I have
> > no strong opinion about this one way or the other.  So I guess that
> > means ACK.
> 
> I will add back the DRV_MODULE_NAME and DRV_MODULE_VERSION and repost.
> 
> What about the message in ep93xx_eth_init_module()?  Would you prefer
> that one to stay?

Most drivers I'm familiar with print a version message when they are
first instantiated -- perhaps that makes more sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html