netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] Regression in linux 2.6.32 virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091217121911.GA8654@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:19:11 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, mst@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Regression in linux 2.6.32 virtio_net seen with
	vhost-net

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 07:45:35PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:27:55AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > So we _should_ get into sch_direct_xmit when the queue was stopped...
> > I guess Herbert might forget the multiqueue change, and Sridhar isn't
> > missing much. ;-)
> 
> Hmm, if that's the case then this new multiqueue code is seriously
> broken.  It means that once the queue is stopped, every new tx packet
> will cause an unnecessary dequeue/requeue, up to 1000.

Hmm, I can even remember who inspired this change ;-) But I'm not sure
this really broken: it seems it's "optimized" for non-stopped case.

Btw, IIRC, Krishna worked on changing this for uniqueues - I wonder if
there could be much difference in testing?

Cheers,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html