[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912171724.32711.schmto@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:24:32 +0100
From: Torsten Schmidt <torsten.schmidt@...06.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: "Philip A. Prindeville" <philipp_subx@...fish-solutions.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Still using IPTOS_TOS() in kernel? Really???
Hi Philip,
interesting .. i am on the way to implement a DSCP/CS statistic to the kernel.
We need this for network traffic accounting. The concept is the following:
We create a virtual file /pro/net/ipdscp , this includes several DSCP/CS
counters. See http://www.iana.org/assignments/dscp-registry/. Every time
ip_rcv_finish() is called, we take a look at the DSCP/CS (iph->tos) value and
increment the related counter. If you're interested in, i will send you a
patch ? ..
Maybe this is a good starting point for an DSCP/CS implementation. I was also
shocked that the kernel do not really handle DiffServ thinks.
> Assuming my crusade to get various common apps and services (wget, TB, FF,
> Sendmail, Cyrus, ProFTPd, etc) to use DSCP/CS marking (very few apps
> currently use DSCP or precedence marking), then kernels with the proper
> default behavior will need to start shipping, right? I.e. out-of-the-box
> kernels should handle such apps without further configuration, such as
> needing to have the DSCP iptables module installed. They should "just
> work".
Right.
Best regards,
Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists