[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091218153209.45042a58.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:32:09 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, benoit.papillault@...e.fr,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14837] New: gretap does not fragment IP
packets
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:10:01 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14837
>
> Summary: gretap does not fragment IP packets
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.32
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV4
> AssignedTo: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
> ReportedBy: benoit.papillault@...e.fr
> Regression: No
>
>
> When gretap is used to encapsulate Ethernet packets into IP packets, the
> encapsulated IP packets are larger than the original Ethernet packet, as
> expected.
>
> Let's say you create a gre0 interface with a 1500 bytes MTU (since this
> interface will latter be inserted in a bridge interface, its MTU must be 1500).
> And Let's say the GRE encapsulated packet (now larger than 1500 bytes) is going
> to be routed over an IP interface with a 1500 bytes MTU.
>
> The expected behavior would be that the encapsulated packet be fragmented. The
> observed behavior is that any encapsulated packets over 1500 bytes are simply
> dropped and an ICMP "fragmentation needed" message is sent to ... who knows.
>
> My feeling is that DF bit is not playing nice here.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists