netdev - Re: [BUG] 2.6.33-rc1 gianfar error message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091221163843.GB3529@gibson.comsick.at>
Date:	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:38:43 +0100
From:	Michael Guntsche <mike@...loops.com>
To:	Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 <B05799@...escale.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.33-rc1 gianfar error message

On 21 Dec 09 14:19, Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 wrote:
> Michael, 
> 
> Kindly try the following changes at your side and let me know the
> results. I couldn't test this
> as I don't have any TSEC device with me.
<snip>

Your patch did not apply to vanilla 2.6.32-rc1 at all. I patched the
code myself and up to now I do not see any error messages. Uptime is at
33 minutes, without the patch the error message appeared immediately
after booting.

Just for my understanding. Is the first diff part of the fix as well?
With this change the FCB is only removed if there are padded bytes, why
would this make a difference here?

Kind regards,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html