[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B2FE882.3080207@redfish-solutions.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:28:34 -0800
From: "Philip A. Prindeville" <philipp_subx@...fish-solutions.com>
To: Torsten Schmidt <torsten.schmidt@...06.tu-chemnitz.de>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Still using IPTOS_TOS() in kernel? Really???
On 12/21/2009 12:50 PM, Torsten Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> here a second PATCH to add the missing DSCP classes to
> ipv4_dscp_stat(), also tested against 2.6.32.
>
> Next step is to add IN / OUT statistic to DSCP. Maybe
> /proc/net/ipdscp will look like:
> CS0 in out
> CS1 in out
> ...
> EF in out
>
>
> any comments ?
> Torsten
Hi Torsten,
Yes, the MIB changes are certainly important... we are more focused though on actually updating the default queuing strategies.
I'll poke around and see if I can figure out how that works...
Looking at include/linux/pkt_sched.h:
#define TC_PRIO_BESTEFFORT 0
#define TC_PRIO_FILLER 1
#define TC_PRIO_BULK 2
#define TC_PRIO_INTERACTIVE_BULK 4
#define TC_PRIO_INTERACTIVE 6
#define TC_PRIO_CONTROL 7
it seems that these TC priorities are just random, unrelated buckets and their ordinality has no relation to their priority. Is that correct?
If that's the case, then you *can't* just do:
static inline char rt_dscp2priority(u8 tos)
{
return IPTOS_PREC(tos)>>5;
}
for instance. No, that would be too easy. :-)
-Philip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists