[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C757AC34.1B4BB%scofeldm@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:15:00 -0800
From: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@...co.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 5/6] enic: feature add: add ethtool -c/C support
On 12/23/09 10:13 AM, "Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 18:21 -0800, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> From: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@...co.com>
>>
>> Only rx_usec and tx_usec options for ethtool -C are settable as those
>> are the only settings that make sense to HW. Adds driver reporting of
>> intr coalescing timer value in usec units rather than HW units.
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c b/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c
>> index 019b148..81cc68d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c
>> @@ -261,7 +261,63 @@ static void enic_set_msglevel(struct net_device *netdev,
>> u32 value)
>> enic->msg_enable = value;
>> }
>>
>> -static const struct ethtool_ops enic_ethtool_ops = {
> [...]
>> +static struct ethtool_ops enic_ethtool_ops = {
> [...]
>
> I don't see any reason to remove the const here. Is that an accidental
> change?
That was a mistake. Sigh. Let me resend patch set without that change...
[I'll wait a while in case there are any more review comments]
-scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists