netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: for tcp westwood implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <39ba5b880912280252y208eb8bby7b54289fcd3965af@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:52:23 +0900
From:	Jae-Hyun Hwang <jhhwang@...korea.ac.kr>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: for tcp westwood implementation

Is it still wrong?
I hope this patch is successful.

From: Jae-Hyun Hwang <jhhwang@...korea.ac.kr>

Current net/ipv4/tcp_westwood.c seems to be unnatural when compared
with Westwood papers.
Since Linux TCP calls '.ssthresh' interface whenever packet loss is
detected, it is more natural that the interface points to
'tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin' function, not Reno's function.
This patch also enables Westwood to perform its algorithm when
CA_EVENT_LOSS event is generated as explained in the papers.

Signed-off-by: Jae-Hyun Hwang <jhhwang@...korea.ac.kr>

---

--- linux-2.6.32.2/net/ipv4/tcp_westwood.c.orig	2009-12-28
13:35:42.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.32.2/net/ipv4/tcp_westwood.c	2009-12-28 13:36:54.000000000 +0900
@@ -232,12 +232,7 @@ static void tcp_westwood_event(struct so
 		westwood_fast_bw(sk);
 		break;

-	case CA_EVENT_COMPLETE_CWR:
-		tp->snd_cwnd = tp->snd_ssthresh = tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin(sk);
-		break;
-
 	case CA_EVENT_FRTO:
-		tp->snd_ssthresh = tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin(sk);
 		/* Update RTT_min when next ack arrives */
 		w->reset_rtt_min = 1;
 		break;
@@ -274,9 +269,8 @@ static void tcp_westwood_info(struct soc

 static struct tcp_congestion_ops tcp_westwood = {
 	.init		= tcp_westwood_init,
-	.ssthresh	= tcp_reno_ssthresh,
+	.ssthresh	= tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin,
 	.cong_avoid	= tcp_reno_cong_avoid,
-	.min_cwnd	= tcp_westwood_bw_rttmin,
 	.cwnd_event	= tcp_westwood_event,
 	.get_info	= tcp_westwood_info,
 	.pkts_acked	= tcp_westwood_pkts_acked,
--



On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> wrote:
> On 28-12-2009 07:35, Jae-Hyun Hwang wrote:
>> I'm sorry about posting such a damaged email.
>> I resubmit the patch by plain-text.
>
> Most probably it's still wrong (e.g. no tabs).
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=126198215600946&q=raw
>
> Did you try to send it to yourself?
>
> Jarek P.
>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:56 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> - Hide quoted text -
>>> Annyoung-haseyo,
>>>
>>> Your patch was damaged by your email client (long lines
>>> were chopped up with newlines, etc.), as such it is not
>>> usable.
>>>
>>> Please fix this up and resubmit your patch.
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html