[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1262190575.5685.8.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:29:35 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: thomas yang <lampsu@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ethernet CRC questions
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 00:19 +0800, thomas yang wrote:
> >>
> >> Does the Ethernet frame CRC (generate and verify in hardware) make
> >> the TX / RX rate a little smaller , and a longer end-to-end delay ?
> >
> > Relative to what?
> >
>
> Relative to the Ethernet frame without CRC appending / verifying .
>
>
> In IEEE 802.3 standard, all network devices should append/verify CRC?
Not 'should' but 'must'.
> >> Could I disable CRC appending / verifying in the network card driver
> >> on all of my nodes (machines) ?
> >
> > Maybe if you want switches to discard everything you send...
> >
>
> So, I should disable CRC appending / verifying on all kinds of network
> devices in my network?
> In this way I will TX/RX packets more faster ?
You will probably not be able to disable CRC validation on switches
because it is not a sensible thing to do. So if you disable CRC
generation on NICs then your network will notwork.
Really, 32 bit-times is not much to worry about (only 320 ns even at
100M). There are likely to be much bigger sources of latency to attack.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists