netdev - RE: [PATCH] ep93xx_eth.c: general cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE19090200F635@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:03:00 -0500
From:	"H Hartley Sweeten" <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To:	"Lennert Buytenhek" <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Cc:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<joe@...ches.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ep93xx_eth.c: general cleanup

On Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "H Hartley Sweeten" <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:34:55 -0500
>
>> Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:32 AM, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:18:13PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>
>>>> V3 - Change pr_fmt() as suggested by Joe Perches
>>>>      Don't remove DRV_MODULE_NAME and DRV_MODULE_VERSION
>>>>      Don't remove the message in ep93xx_eth_init_module()
>>>
>>> That's not what I meant, but alright, as you prefer.
>> 
>> Guess my parser is off line today.... ;-)
>> 
>> What did you mean?
>
> This patch also doesn't apply to current sources, so if you
> could also please respin this once you've resolved the feedback
> that would be great.

Lennert,

Since I need to respin this patch what did you mean by this comment?

On Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:09 AM, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:06:10PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>
>>>> General cleanup of the ep93xx_eth driver.
>>>
>>> Apart from keeping DRV_MODULE_NAME and DRV_MODULE_VERSION, I have
>>> no strong opinion about this one way or the other.  So I guess that
>>> means ACK.
>> 
>> I will add back the DRV_MODULE_NAME and DRV_MODULE_VERSION and repost.
>> 
>> What about the message in ep93xx_eth_init_module()?  Would you prefer
>> that one to stay?
>
> Most drivers I'm familiar with print a version message when they are
> first instantiated -- perhaps that makes more sense.

I will wait for your reply before updating the patch.

Thanks,
Hartley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html