[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1r5qdt721.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:33:10 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>,
Michael Stone <michael@...top.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, David Lang <david@...g.hm>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
"C. Scott Ananian" <cscott@...ott.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Bernie Innocenti <bernie@...ewiz.org>,
Mark Seaborn <mrs@...hic-beasts.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Unprivileged: Disable acquisition of privileges
Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com> writes:
> Is this sufficient for other security models such as selinux or
> TOMOYO? Can processes in these models gain privileges through means
> not restricted here?
The LSM is primarily about returning -EPERM more often.
Except for the prctl and the capability hooks I am not aware
of anywhere a LSM can increase a processes capabilities.
> Also, perhaps there should be a corresponding GET prctl?
Probably for the final version.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists