netdev - Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:14:50 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	NetDEV list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors

Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> writes:

> On 01/04/2010 11:48 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> [Adding Suresh to the Cc: list]
>> 
>> On 01/04/2010 11:35 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> so we can use [0x10, 0x1f]
>>>
>>> sth like this?
>>>
>> 
>> No!!!
>> 
>> [0x10, 0x1f] is reserved for exceptions.  We can probably get away with
>> stealing *one* vector... presumably at the end (0x1f).  However, we can
>> absolutely not use the whole block: 0x10-0x13 is occupied by exceptions
>> we already have OS support for (#MF, #AC, #MC, and #XM), and it's pretty
>> much guaranteed we'll have more coming.  However, growth is quite slow
>> and since this is a kernel-internal vector (not accessible to user
>> space) it is not creating an API.
>> 
>> In other words, we could change FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR to 0x1f, and use
>> it for IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR.  Then use 0x20..0x2f for the legacy vectors.
>> 
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 16 vectors
>
> -v2: according to hpa that we could start from 0x1f

The code in the patch is ok, but the comments are wrong.

>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h |    9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> @@ -30,8 +30,9 @@
>  /*
>   * IDT vectors usable for external interrupt sources start
>   * at 0x20:
> + * hpa said we can start from 0x1f

You need to document the reasons here.

>   */
> -#define FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR		0x20
> +#define FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR		0x1f
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>  # define SYSCALL_VECTOR			0x80
> @@ -41,15 +42,15 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> - * Reserve the lowest usable priority level 0x20 - 0x2f for triggering
> + * Reserve the lowest usable priority level 0x1f for triggering

Should be:
+   * Reserve the lowest usable priority level 0x10 - 0x1f for triggering
>   * cleanup after irq migration.

+   * this overlaps with the reserved range for cpu exceptions so this
+   * will need to be changed to 0x20 - 0x2f if the last cpu exception is
+   * ever allocated.
>   */
>  #define IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR		FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR
>  
>  /*
> - * Vectors 0x30-0x3f are used for ISA interrupts.
> + * Vectors 0x20-0x2f are used for ISA interrupts.
>   */
> -#define IRQ0_VECTOR			(FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 0x10)
> +#define IRQ0_VECTOR			(FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 1)
>  
>  #define IRQ1_VECTOR			(IRQ0_VECTOR +  1)
>  #define IRQ2_VECTOR			(IRQ0_VECTOR +  2)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html