[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1262787442.22735.10.camel@jdb-workstation>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:17:22 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>
To: Mark Smith <lk-netdev@...netdev.nosense.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: RFC3069, private VLAN proxy arp support
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 23:22 +1030, Mark Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:49:29 +0100
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk> wrote:
> >
> > This patch solved the issue by doing proxy arp'ing on the router against
> > the "local" network, thus making it possible for customers to
> > communicate, but via the router. This also gives the ability to do
> > firewalling on the router between customers on an Ethernet. (In our
> > solution the Linux router also have a personal firewall configurable per
> > customer.)
> >
>
> I can see value in that - you're forcing all traffic through the
> upstream router for policy enforcement purposes, without having to have
> point-to-point (simulated or otherwise) links between customers and the
> router, and avoiding IP address waste by not using /30s. You're pretty
> much making the ethernet a Non-broadcast Multi-Access link.
Yes, its actually a quite nice trick, and several switch vendors have
supported this technology for years (although they all annoying call it
something differently). And we/ComX have actually also been using this
for years, including my patch (sorry for being so slow with upstream
submission).
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Jesper Brouer
ComX Networks A/S
Linux Network Kernel Developer
Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.CS
Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists