[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B44DD9F.4020807@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:59:43 +0100
From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@...puter.org>
To: Mark Smith <lk-netdev@...netdev.nosense.org>
CC: hawk@...x.dk, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: RFC3069, private VLAN proxy arp support
Mark Smith wrote:
> I can see value in that - you're forcing all traffic through the
> upstream router for policy enforcement purposes, without having to have
> point-to-point (simulated or otherwise) links between customers and the
> router, and avoiding IP address waste by not using /30s. You're pretty
> much making the ethernet a Non-broadcast Multi-Access link.
Similar to what DSLAMs do...
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists