[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2y6kbm2xw.fsf@ssh.synack.fr>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:46:35 +0100
From: Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/9] snet: introduce snet_core.c and snet.h
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> writes:
>> +struct snet_event {
>> + enum snet_syscall syscall;
>> + u8 protocol;
>> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> Does this really need to be packed? You're using it in a
> struct snet_event_entry, which is padded anyways.
I think that that members needs to be aligned, because this struct is
used for the jhash() computation.
when testing on x86_64, I discovered that jhash value wasn't the same,
for a same struct snet_event. Then I thougth about misaligned data, and
possible 'hole' between syscall and protocol.
anyway, I patched the code to use jhash_2words() or jhash_1word().
here is a patch, which apply on top of initial serie
thank you Patrick,
sam
commit bacdb6b62549b58370298f89f908d66c5a3cab66
Author: Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>
Date: Wed Jan 6 20:36:06 2010 +0100
snet : delete attribute packed for snet_event and use proper jash functions
the structure snet_event was using the attribute packed, which seems to be
unnecessary.
this patch also fix the good compute of hashes, by moving jash() to
jash_1word() and jash_2words()
Noticed by Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Signed-off-by: Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>
diff --git a/security/snet/include/snet.h b/security/snet/include/snet.h
index 47da614..75b32d5 100644
--- a/security/snet/include/snet.h
+++ b/security/snet/include/snet.h
@@ -9,6 +9,6 @@
struct snet_event {
enum snet_syscall syscall;
u8 protocol;
-} __attribute__ ((packed));
+};
#endif /* _SNET_H */
diff --git a/security/snet/snet_event.c b/security/snet/snet_event.c
index 9f0b0f3..cc3b6a2 100644
--- a/security/snet/snet_event.c
+++ b/security/snet/snet_event.c
@@ -24,17 +24,12 @@ static struct snet_event_entry *__snet_event_lookup(const enum snet_syscall sysc
unsigned int h = 0;
struct list_head *l;
struct snet_event_entry *s;
- struct snet_event t;
if (!snet_evh)
return NULL;
- /* building the element to look for */
- t.syscall = syscall;
- t.protocol = protocol;
-
/* computing its hash value */
- h = jhash(&t, sizeof(struct snet_event), 0) % snet_evh_size;
+ h = jhash_2words(syscall, protocol, 0) % snet_evh_size;
l = &snet_evh[h];
list_for_each_entry(s, l, list) {
@@ -127,7 +122,7 @@ int snet_event_insert(const enum snet_syscall syscall, const u8 protocol)
data->se.syscall = syscall;
data->se.protocol = protocol;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(data->list));
- h = jhash(&(data->se), sizeof(struct snet_event), 0) % snet_evh_size;
+ h = jhash_2words(data->se.syscall, data->se.protocol, 0) % snet_evh_size;
list_add_tail(&data->list, &snet_evh[h]);
write_unlock_bh(&snet_evh_lock);
pr_debug("[%u]=(syscall=%s, protocol=%u)\n",
diff --git a/security/snet/snet_verdict.c b/security/snet/snet_verdict.c
index 0cad06b..477af3b 100644
--- a/security/snet/snet_verdict.c
+++ b/security/snet/snet_verdict.c
@@ -29,18 +29,16 @@ static struct snet_verdict_entry *__snet_verdict_lookup(const u32 verdict_id)
unsigned int h = 0;
struct list_head *l = NULL;
struct snet_verdict_entry *s = NULL;
- u32 vid = 0;
if (!snet_vdh)
return NULL;
- vid = verdict_id;
/* computing its hash value */
- h = jhash(&vid, sizeof(u32), 0) % snet_vdh_size;
+ h = jhash_1word(verdict_id, 0) % snet_vdh_size;
l = &snet_vdh[h];
list_for_each_entry(s, l, list) {
- if (s->verdict_id == vid) {
+ if (s->verdict_id == verdict_id) {
return s;
}
}
@@ -134,7 +132,7 @@ int snet_verdict_insert(void)
data->verdict_id = verdict_id;
data->verdict = SNET_VERDICT_PENDING;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(data->list));
- h = jhash(&(data->verdict_id), sizeof(u32), 0) % snet_vdh_size;
+ h = jhash_1word(data->verdict_id, 0) % snet_vdh_size;
write_lock_bh(&snet_vdh_lock);
if (snet_vdh) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists