[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B46D053.3000604@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:27:31 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rps: some comments
Le 08/01/2010 01:07, Tom Herbert a écrit :
> I kind of like the way it is right now, which is to enqueue even on
> the local CPU. The advantage of that is that all the packets received
> in the napi run are dispatched to all the participating CPUs before
> any are processed, this is good for average and worst case latency on
> a packet burst.
I see... this makes sense, thanks.
Do you know if some non multi queue NIC would be able to provide us
a suitable hash to fill skb->rxhash in NIC driver itself ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists