netdev - Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <4B48CC2C.2090403@majjas.com>
Date:	Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:34:20 -0500
From:	Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	flyboy@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit()

On 1/9/2010 7:28 AM, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:45:35PM -0500, Michael Breuer wrote:
>    
>> On 1/8/2010 4:48 PM, Michael Breuer wrote:
>>      
>>> On 1/8/2010 4:29 PM, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>> ...
>>>        
>>>> BTW, don't hurry with that yet, but in the next test, please try
>>>> alternative 2 again (i.e. with MMAP + no DMAR + disable_msi).
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> Will do - still up from yesterday... no more dropped packets...
>>> none of the dns errors either. To be expected I suppose as long as
>>> I'm trying to sniff it. Assuming no immediate erorrs with alt2, no
>>> DMAR + disable_msi I'll report back after it's been up for a
>>> while.
>>> -- 
>>>        
>> Ok - ran alt1 and alt2, both with MMAP, no DMAR and disable_msi.
>> Both seem to behave similarly. No logged errors;
>>      
> Ok - since alt2 introduces less changes and is acked by Stephen
> already, I'll resend it with your "Tested-by" in a new thread to clear
> things a bit.
>
>    
Ok - good, and thank you for all your help.
>> large numbers of dropped RX packets.
>>      
> You might try some tweaking with another sky2 parameter "copybreak"
> or even editing its "NAPI_WEIGHT" variable.
>
>    
I'll play around with this after I figure out what's actually being 
dropped and why. Looking at ethtool, over 99% of RX packets are in the 
 >=1024 bucket. I'll play with weight and perhaps rmem as time permits.
>> One odd thing: when driving every sort of
>> traffic through, I was able to hose the client adapter (win7)
>> repeatedly by runnnig the win7 backup and connecting Windows Media
>> Player to a Mediatomb stream while also running a remote X11
>> session. Looks like the SSDP traffic that occurs at the same time as
>> the SMB traffic and X11 traffic takes out the adapter on Win7 -
>> Nforce.
>> Reran with msi enabled, MMAP and no DMAR. Also no errors; much
>> faster, and the Win7 side survives the same conditions that don't
>> work when msi is disabled. Doesn't make sense to me, but it is what
>> it is.
>>
>> Going to leave this up for a while and see if things remain functional.
>>      
> It looks like DMAR is the main candidate for a new linux-kernel@ or
> bugzilla bug report. You should also consider reporting these ipv6
> problems, especially if you think they can trigger TX timeouts. (In
> both cases it would be good to try current mainline first, when you
> get it workable.)
>    
Ok - I'll get onto mainline and then deal with DMAR.
> Thanks,
> Jarek P.
>    

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html