[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100108.174138.193059500.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:41:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nhorman@...driver.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Subject: Re: BSD 4.2 style TCP keepalives
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 20:22:27 -0500
> I'm trying to do some independent computation on it, but its looking
> like this may have been a combination of old software (win2k) and a
> bad corner case in hardware. I think the reporter has a NIC that
> doesn't do TCO properly on these old style keepalives, which would
> explain why it wasn't reproducable outside of the reporters
> environment. I'm trying to figure out which card/hw revision of NIC
> they were using. It might be worth coding an errata check into the
> appropriate driver if this all turns out to be accurate to disable
> TCO affectecd hw.
I think it's not a hardware bug, because there isn't anything
interesting about these packets from a checksumming perspective.
It's just a normal 1-byte TCP data frame as far as the card is
concerned.
Rather, I think when checksum offloading, win2k doesn't set the
internal packet state correctly for such probe packets such that the
card is told to checksum the frame.
Ie. a win2k TCP bug and nothing to do with the card or it's driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists