[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2r5puipte.fsf@ssh.synack.fr>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:36:29 +0100
From: Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/9] snet: introduce snet_netlink.c and snet_netlink.h
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> writes:
> Samir Bellabes wrote:
>> +++ b/security/snet/include/snet_netlink.h
>> +
>> +struct snet_sock_half {
>> + struct {
>> + union {
>> + __be32 ip;
>> + struct in6_addr ip6;
>> + };
>> + } u3;
>> + struct {
>> + __be16 port;
>> + } u;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct snet_sock_info {
>> + struct snet_sock_half src;
>> + struct snet_sock_half dst;
>> + int type;
>> +};
>
> How about using a struct sockaddr or encoding the values within
> netlink attributes? That would provide a bit more flexibility in
> case you want to support more protocols in the future.
indeed, I already move to the encoding of values independantly within
netlink attributes. This had to be done before, and it was in the
TODO, so now it's done.
At first, I tried to use a attribute NLA_BINARY with all the datas
inside snet_sock_info, so it won't break the netlink protocol between
userspace and kernel, at each modification (adding/removing element
inside the structure)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists