lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:57:07 -0500
From:	Jeff Moyer <>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <>
Cc:	Matt Mackall <>, David Miller <>,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: allow execution of multiple rx_hooks per interface

Daniel Borkmann <> writes:

> Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> Matt Mackall wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 15:59 -0800, David Miller wrote:
>>>> From: Matt Mackall <>
>>>> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:21:48 -0600
>>>>> Looks pretty good. Dave?
>>>>> Acked-by: Matt Mackall <>
>>>> I don't like the loop for RX ARP processing.
>>>> The packet contents aren't going to change, so doing basic
>>>> packet validation inside of the "for each RX client" loop
>>>> of arp_reply() doesn't make any sense.
>>> True. Dan, please help our poor compilers with some manual loop
>>> invariant motion.
>> Okay, true. I'll fix this by tomorrow and resend the patch.
> Here the fix of the RX ARP processing routine. Content that isn't
> going to change is out-of-loop.
> Successfully tested on my machines.

Against what tree does this patch apply?  It doesn't apply to Linus's
git tree.  Also, in the future, could you use the -p option to diff so
we can see what function or data structure is being modified?  It really
helps in reviewing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists