[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4B4F4A57.5050708@majjas.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:46:15 -0500
From: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>
To: Mike McCormack <mikem@...g3k.org>
Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, shemminger@...tta.com,
flyboy@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: safer transmit ring cleaning (v4)
On 1/14/2010 8:19 AM, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:20:09AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>>
>>> From: Jarek Poplawski<jarkao2@...il.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:16:36 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>>> So, now I really ;-) agree with David: this needs a proper fix.
>>>>
>>> Now Jarek, do you now see my dirty little secret?
>>>
>>> When people disagree with me, I just silently sit around waiting for
>>> them to eventually change their mind.
>>>
>>> Isn't it brilliant? -)
>>>
>> If it were that easy... (it never works for me :-()
>>
>> Probably, there is something more... ;-)
>>
> Here's what was sitting in my tree...
>
>
> Subject: [PATCH] sky2: Don't detach device when restarting
>
> Block the tx queue from transmitting when restarting
> rather than trying to take the device offline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike McCormack<mikem@...g3k.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/sky2.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sky2.c b/drivers/net/sky2.c
> index d76d907..061f6f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/sky2.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/sky2.c
> @@ -1580,6 +1580,8 @@ static int sky2_up(struct net_device *dev)
> if (netif_msg_ifup(sky2))
> printk(KERN_INFO PFX "%s: enabling interface\n", dev->name);
>
> + netif_start_queue(dev);
> +
> return 0;
>
> err_out:
> @@ -1596,6 +1598,8 @@ static inline int tx_inuse(const struct sky2_port *sky2)
> /* Number of list elements available for next tx */
> static inline int tx_avail(const struct sky2_port *sky2)
> {
> + if (unlikely(!sky2->tx_ring))
> + return 0;
> return sky2->tx_pending - tx_inuse(sky2);
> }
>
> @@ -1925,7 +1929,9 @@ static int sky2_down(struct net_device *dev)
> sky2_read32(hw, B0_IMSK);
>
> synchronize_irq(hw->pdev->irq);
> - napi_synchronize(&hw->napi);
> + netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
> + napi_disable(&hw->napi);
> + netif_stop_queue(dev);
>
> spin_lock_bh(&sky2->phy_lock);
> sky2_phy_power_down(hw, port);
> @@ -1939,6 +1945,8 @@ static int sky2_down(struct net_device *dev)
> sky2_rx_clean(sky2);
>
> sky2_free_buffers(sky2);
> + napi_enable(&hw->napi);
> + netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -3177,9 +3185,6 @@ static void sky2_reset(struct sky2_hw *hw)
> static void sky2_detach(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> if (netif_running(dev)) {
> - netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
> - netif_device_detach(dev); /* stop txq */
> - netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
> sky2_down(dev);
> }
> }
> -- 1.5.6.5
>
Ok - no obvious difference with this patch + Stephen's.
I still see:
No reported errors; decent throughput; earlier issues with IRQ resolved.
But... still seeing DHCP DISCOVER/OFFER (no REQUEST/ACK) while under
load. I can try to sniff this... but given that it's under load, I'd
probably have to filter out non DHCP stuff and might miss whatever is
really going on. Again - main point here is that absent these patches I
don't see this issue. It's also possible that these two patches allow
the load to be heavier thus actually causing a different problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists