[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4F1044.8080500@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:38:28 -0500
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: andi@...stfloor.org, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Generalized TTL Security Mechanism
David Miller wrote:
> The idea is that the min_ttl is set very high, so that
> you'll only accept packets from hosts that started with
> a ttl of 255 and are within a hop or two from you. (therefore
> you'd set min_ttl to 254 or 253, something like that)
>
That's not a particularly good idea:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ip-parameters
IP TIME TO LIVE PARAMETER
The current recommended default time to live (TTL) for the Internet
Protocol (IP) is 64 [RFC791, RFC1122].
===
It always bugs me that things get incorrectly labeled "security", yet
cannot secure anything.
Security requires a secret.
Various folks tried all kinds of games with TTL for BGP, but the only
thing that _actually_ provided security was MD5 authentication.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists